Sweeping legal reforms passed by Florida Legislature, dividing Republicans

TALLAHASSEE — No laws this session has scrambled get together loyalties like HB 837, a sweeping overhaul of Florida’s authorized panorama that may make it tougher, and dearer, to sue insurance coverage firms.

On Thursday, the Senate handed the invoice with four Republicans voting towards it, a uncommon cut up that also sends the invoice to Gov. Ron DeSantis’ desk.

Three different Republican senators have flip-flopped on the invoice — voting towards it in committees, then for it on the Senate flooring. One Democratic senator voted for it, splitting from her get together.

The consternation stems from the broad sweep of the invoice — and the truth that Floridians pay the very best auto and owners insurance coverage charges within the nation.

DeSantis and prime Republican leaders say the laws is important to curb the excessive variety of lawsuits, which is able to in flip drive down charges.

“Individuals imagine they’ve gained the jackpot with the litigation lottery,” stated Sen. Travis Hutson, R-Elkton, the sponsor of the Senate model of the invoice. “We’ve an issue in Florida. Assist me repair it.”

However they’ve little proof that lawsuits are harming the state’s financial system. One of many key modifications actually can’t result in decrease charges. And lawmakers have already labored to curb litigation towards property insurance coverage firms, but charges proceed to rise.

Some Republican senators have been involved that the invoice tilts the scales too far in favor of insurance coverage firms. Former President Donald Trump called it a “bailout” for insurance coverage firms.

“If this turns into regulation, peculiar Floridians, small companies, trucking firms, mother and pop retailers, might be left holding the bag for judgments and lawsuits their insurance coverage firms had been supposed to forestall,” Sen. Erin Grall, R-Vero Seashore, who’s herself a trial lawyer, stated Wednesday.

Parkland dad and mom towards invoice

Lawmakers had been additionally moved by testimony from the tons of of various folks and curiosity teams who testified in committees: accident victims, Parkland parents, tattooed bikers and medical doctors.

The laws has a broad sweep that impacts all types of litigation, however the principle provisions would:

  • Put off the state’s roughly 130-year-old regulation requiring insurance coverage firms to pay the policyholder’s legal professional’s charges if the policyholder sues and wins in court docket. The supply was meant to degree the taking part in subject between policyholders and insurance coverage firms
  • Restrict how a lot somebody might gather in medical bills in negligence lawsuits.
  • Require juries in lawsuits towards residence complexes and different locations over lax safety to weigh the position of criminals — such because the Parkland shooter — when figuring out the extent of negligence.

Parkland dad and mom and victims of shootings at residence complexes stated that the invoice would let property homeowners off the hook for offering shoddy safety, testimony that moved some lawmakers.

RELATED: Why two Parkland parents spoke out against Florida lawmakers’ tort reform bill

“These victims traveled the state and begged us to not permit locations the place we go to and we stay grow to be much less protected,” stated Sen. Jennifer Bradley, R-Fleming Island, who voted towards the invoice.

Two Republican senators who personal small companies, together with Sen. Nick DiCeglie, R-St. Petersburg, fearful over one other provision that may permit legal responsibility insurers to flee being sued for “dangerous religion.”

The supply might open companies as much as million-dollar judgments if their insurance coverage firms don’t shortly settle a case. That’s what occurred when the native proprietor of a number of Tampa Bay Pinch A Penny pool provide shops was sued after an worker at certainly one of its franchised places drove a company truck while drunk and crashed on Bayshore Boulevard, killing a pedestr

The corporate’s legal responsibility provider by no means made a proposal to the sufferer’s household, which induced the household to sue, in keeping with the corporate. The corporate is now suing the provider, saying it acted in “dangerous religion” by not shortly paying the sufferer’s household.

The bad-faith provision prompted DiCeglie to vote towards the invoice in committee. After it was amended barely, he voted for it on the Home flooring.

“I’m nonetheless a bit of bit involved, however I didn’t need to throw the newborn out with the bathwater,” he stated.

That provision can’t result in decrease charges. Underneath state regulation, insurance coverage firms are forbidden from passing the prices of “bad-faith” lawsuits on to clients.

Sen. Tom Wright, R-Port Orange, additionally voted towards the invoice in committee.

“I’ve been listening to my constituents,” Wright stated final week. “You might have 150 ‘noes’ and three ‘yeses,’ so that they voted me in, and I might be down on this invoice.”

On the Senate flooring, nonetheless, Wright voted for it.

“A few of them have modified their thoughts,” Wright stated of his constituents.

• • •

Tampa Bay Instances Florida Legislature protection

Join our publication: Get Capitol Buzz, a special bonus edition of The Buzz with Emily L. Mahoney, each Saturday while the Legislature is meeting.

Watch the Florida Legislature stay: The Florida Channel, a public affairs programming service funded by the Legislature, livestreams protection at thefloridachannel.org. Its video library additionally archives protection for later viewing.


We’re working laborious to deliver you the newest information from the state’s legislative session. This effort takes a number of sources to collect and replace. If you happen to haven’t already subscribed, please consider buying a print or digital subscription.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button